A Detailed Analysis of Articles 14, 15, and 21 in the Indian Constitution
This work has been verified by our teacher: 15.01.2026 at 20:35
Type of homework: Analysis
Added: 15.01.2026 at 19:48
Summary:
Analiza artykułów 14, 15 i 21 Konstytucji Indii: równość, zakaz dyskryminacji i prawo do godnego życia jako filary sprawiedliwości. 🇮🇳⚖️
The Constitutional Promise of Justice: Analysing Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Indian Constitution
Justice stands as the most sacred pillar on which the Indian democracy rests. It is deeply interwoven with our civilisational ethos, stretching from the wisdom of the Vedas to the clarion calls of independence-era reformers. The Constitution of India, fashioned after a long and arduous struggle for freedom, is not merely a legal document but a living testament to our shared commitment towards justice, equality, and personal liberty. Among its numerous provisions, Articles 14, 15, and 21 assume a central role, acting as sentinels that guard the rights and dignity of every individual, irrespective of their birth or background.
These Articles do much more than simply confer rights—they articulate a vision of India where every person, regardless of caste, gender, or creed, is treated as an equal before the law; where discrimination finds no shelter; and where the right to live is interpreted as the right to live with dignity, not mere survival. This essay endeavours to critically explore these three constitutional guarantees, delving into their origins, interpretations, and contemporary significance in upholding justice in Indian society.
---
Understanding the Constitutional Provisions
Article 14: Equality Before the Law
Article 14 declares that "The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India." While at first glance these phrases may seem synonymous, their nuanced distinction lies at the heart of India’s approach to justice. “Equality before the law” embodies the British ideal of treating everyone the same, with no special privileges; “equal protection of the laws” draws upon the American tradition, requiring not only equal treatment but also that similar cases be treated alike.Yet, the law recognises that treating unlike cases identically can perpetuate injustice—in a land as diverse as India, the needs of different groups often diverge sharply. Hence, the doctrine of “reasonable classification” allows the State to make distinctions if they are based on intelligible differentia and have a rational relation to the object sought. For example, special provisions for women or reservation in education for Scheduled Castes and Tribes fall within permissible classification, not as violations but as fulfilment of real equality.
The Indian judiciary has robustly enforced Article 14, often striking down arbitrary or capricious actions of the executive and legislature. In the *E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu* case, the Supreme Court memorably stated, “Equality is a dynamic concept with many aspects and dimensions.” By this measure, administrative or legislative actions must not just be non-arbitrary but also fair and just.
Article 15: Prohibition of Discrimination
Where Article 14 lays down the general principle of equality, Article 15 provides sharp focus by forbidding discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. This reflects India’s bitter historical lessons with casteism and communal divides. Importantly, Article 15(3) and 15(4) empower the State to create affirmative measures for women, children, and socially disadvantaged communities. Such positive discrimination, as embodied through reservations in educational institutions and public employment, is a bulwark in the pursuit of substantive equality.Judicial pronouncements have played a vital facilitating role here. For instance, in the landmark *Indra Sawhney v. Union of India* (the Mandal Commission case), the Supreme Court upheld reservations for Other Backward Classes, clarifying that affirmative action does not violate equality, but rather advances it.
Further, the interpretation of Article 15 has evolved—in *Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India* (2018), the Supreme Court read down Section 377 of the IPC, stating that discrimination based on sexual orientation falls afoul of Article 15. The compass of non-discrimination thus continues to expand, seeking to include all identities unjustly cast to the periphery.
Article 21: The Right to Life and Personal Liberty
Among all the Fundamental Rights, Article 21 stands out for its immense breadth: "No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law." Over time, what began as a simple promise against arbitrary deprivation has been transformed by judicial creativity into a towering guarantee for myriad rights.The journey of Article 21’s interpretation is best illustrated through *Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India* (1978), where the Supreme Court pronounced that any “procedure established by law” must be “just, fair, and reasonable”—thus, procedural fairness became intrinsic to liberty. Over decades, the right to life has come to embrace the right to privacy (as held in *K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India*), the right to a clean environment, the right to livelihood, and even the right to die with dignity.
This broadened meaning acts as a judicial safety net, ensuring that the dignity of the individual becomes the lynchpin of all State action.
---
Philosophical and Social Foundations of Justice in India
Justice, within the Indian context, transcends mere legality. In the ancient Upanishads and the Arthashastra, justice (Nyaya) was seen as “Dharma”—a harmonious balance of rights, duties, and moral rectitude. Compassion (karuna), mutual respect, and societal well-being have shaped our understanding of a just order.Mahatma Gandhi’s doctrine of satya (truth) and ahimsa (non-violence) profoundly influenced the constitutional conception of justice. Gandhi envisioned an India where the weakest “can feel as safe as the most powerful,” linking justice with moral and social equality, not just formal legal entitlements. The Preamble’s commitment to “Justice – social, economic, and political” is a philosophical legacy of this vision.
It is in this cultural soil that Articles 14, 15, and 21 have taken root, providing not just legal rights but a roadmap towards an equitable and compassionate society.
---
Institutional Roles in Upholding Justice
The Judiciary: Protector and Interpreter
The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court and High Courts, stand as both guardians and interpreters of the Constitution. They have continuously invoked Articles 14, 15, and 21 to protect citizens from State overreach—be it via Public Interest Litigations (PILs), suo motu actions, or robust hearings. The *Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala* judgment set out that the basic structure of the Constitution—including justice and equality—cannot be tampered with.Furthermore, in the *Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan* case, guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at the workplace were laid down using a creative interpretation of Articles 14, 15, and 21, long before Parliament enacted a specific law. This active role of the judiciary has expanded the meaning and impact of these fundamental rights.
Police and Law Enforcement
Law enforcement agencies—especially the police—carry the responsibility to implement the letter and spirit of the law, without prejudice. However, issues like custodial violence, arbitrary arrests, and selective policing have raised concerns about their alignment with constitutional values. Pressure for police reform, increased accountability, and transparent procedures is growing, with the hope that these reforms will translate equality and liberty into daily practice.Educational Institutions: Harbingers of Change
Education is the most effective instrument in the long-term battle for justice and equality. With the implementation of the Right to Education Act, inspired by the spirit of Article 21A (a derivative of Article 21), schools are now more than just centres for academics; they are spaces where children learn about their fundamental rights and duties. By promoting inclusiveness, critical thinking, and constitutional values, educational institutions can be powerful agents for a just society.---
Justice in Action: Practical Illustrations
Judicial activism in India has set benchmarks for human rights. Apart from the aforementioned cases, the *Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation* decision held that the right to livelihood is an integral part of the right to life, thus extending Article 21’s protection to street dwellers and slum dwellers.Social movements, like the Dalit assertion against untouchability and the campaign for women’s reservation in legislatures, demonstrate the ongoing struggle to realise the constitutional vision.
Welfare schemes such as Ayushman Bharat for healthcare, and the One Nation One Ration Card initiative for food security during the Covid-19 pandemic, show the government’s commitment to translating legal rights into real, lived justice.
---
Challenges and Way Forward
Despite monumental progress, the journey towards equality and justice is far from complete. Systemic issues such as caste prejudices, gender-based violence, and disparities in access to justice persist. Lack of awareness, procedural delays, and corruption dilute the impact of even the strongest constitutional protections.Increasing legal literacy, reforming judicial procedures for speedier delivery, and embracing technology (as seen in e-courts and online legal aid) stand out as key strategies for the future.
Above all, constant vigilance by civil society, the media, and the citizenry is essential to ensure that these guarantees do not remain mere words but become the bedrock of Indian democracy.
---
Conclusion
Articles 14, 15, and 21 are not isolated legal provisions, but the foundation of India’s constitutional edifice of justice. They secure equality before the law, seal the doors against discrimination, and uphold the sacredness of life and liberty. Through the combined efforts of courts, civil society, lawmakers, and ordinary citizens, these rights have not only shaped Indian law, but also Indian society and consciousness.As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar warned, “However good a Constitution may be, it is sure to turn out bad because those who are called to work it happen to be a bad lot.” Thus, the onus remains on every stakeholder—including students, lawyers, police, teachers, and politicians—to uphold the constitutional promise. Only then can the vision of an India where “justice, social, economic and political” is not just enshrined in the Preamble but lives and breathes in every village, street, and home, be fully realised.
Let justice not be a privilege, but the birthright of every Indian—fought for, cherished, and upheld for generations to come.
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in